An independent think tank that conducts and disseminates research on ESG and finance

About Jane Jagd

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far Jane Jagd has created 55 blog entries.

Does gender diversity on corporate boards reduce information asymmetry in equity markets?

We examine the relation between the gender diversity on boards of corporations and the levels of information asymmetry in the stock market. Prior evidence suggests that the presence of women on director boards increases the quantity and quality of public disclosure by firms, and we therefore expect firms with higher gender diversity on their boards [...]

By | December 19th, 2017|New research|0 Comments

The Impact of the Morningstar Sustainability Rating on Mutual Fund Flows

We examine the effect of the introduction of Morningstar’s Sustainability Rating in March 2016 on U.S. mutual equity fund flows. Using panel regressions, propensity score matching, and an event study methodology we find strong and robust evidence that retail investors shift money away from low-rated and into high-rated funds. The effect is driven by the [...]

By | December 19th, 2017|New research|0 Comments

Oxford University WP: Corporate Sustainability Performance and Bank Loan Pricing: It Pays to Be Good, but Only When Banks Are Too

This study examines whether and under what conditions corporate sustainability performance is reflected in bank loan prices. By taking the sustainability performance of the lending bank into account, I show that borrowers with strong sustainability performance pay lower loan spreads than borrowers with weak sustainability performance--however, only when the lending bank exhibits strong sustainability performance. [...]

By | December 19th, 2017|New research|0 Comments

CFA Institute survey: Global perceptions of ESG investing 2017

Global CFA Institute members share their views on how ESG issues influence the investment process. 73% take ESG Issues into account – same as in 2015 – primarily to manage risks. The biggest factors that limit the ability to use non-financial information include: ·         Lack of appropriate quantitative ESG info 55% ·         Lack of comparability [...]

By | December 7th, 2017|Ikke kategoriseret, New research|0 Comments

Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Cost of Equity Capital

This article explores the relationship between the quality of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure and the cost of equity capital by analyzing the financial data and CSR reports of A-share listed firms in China from 2008 to 2014. It is shown that the quality of CSR disclosure is negatively related to cost of equity capital [...]

By | December 3rd, 2017|New research|0 Comments

Corporate Social Responsibility and Capital Allocation Efficiency

We investigate the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and firm-level capital allocation efficiency. Using seminal investment-Q framework, we provide evidence that CSR distorts investment sensitivity to Q. We further determine that this effect of CSR is moderated by the assumed level of agency conflict, stakeholder engagement, as well as financial slack. We also document [...]

By | December 3rd, 2017|New research|0 Comments

The Effect of Investor Inattention on Voluntary Disclosure

We employ a shock to institutional investor attention developed by Kempf, Manconi, and Spalt (2016) to examine whether investor attention influences firms’ voluntary disclosure decisions. Using three common voluntary disclosure methods (management guidance, non-GAAP disclosures, and conference calls), we investigate whether a change in investor attention affects firms’ propensity to provide voluntary disclosure and the [...]

By | December 3rd, 2017|New research|0 Comments

PRI publishes voluntary climate reporting indicators based on TCFD recommendations

Following COP23, the PRI has published new voluntary climate-related indicators in its Reporting Framework aligned with the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations. As of the 2018 reporting cycle, signatories will be able to voluntarily report and disclose on 14 new indicators and six original indicators which have been updated following TCFD recommendations. [...]

By | November 27th, 2017|New research|0 Comments

Pay for Praise: Do Rating Agencies Get Paid More When They Provide Higher Ratings? An Examination of the Consequences of the Recalibration of Municipal Debt

We ask whether credit rating agencies receive higher fees and gain greater market share when they provide more favorable ratings. We investigate this issue using Fitch and Moody’s 2010 recalibration of their rating scales, which increased ratings in the absence of any underlying change in issuer credit quality. Consistent with concerns raised by critics of [...]

By | November 24th, 2017|New research|0 Comments

Member State Implementation of Directive 2014/95/EU

A comprehensive overview of how Member States are implementing the EU Directive on Non-financial and Diversity Information.  The last two years have been a defining time for corporate non-financial reporting in Europe. The introduction of the EU Directive on the disclosure of non-financial and diversity information (Directive 2014/95/EU) has set a clear course towards greater [...]

By | November 24th, 2017|New research|0 Comments